Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

three-wheeler / default rider 183 cm

Adiva AD3 300 vs Adiva AR3 200 ergonomics

Adiva AD3 300 and Adiva AR3 200 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.

Modeled fit comparison

Adiva AD3 300

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Adiva AR3 200

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Adiva AD3 300 lists a 700 mm seat; the Adiva AR3 200 lists 700 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Adiva AD3 300 and Adiva AR3 200
SpecAdiva AD3 300Adiva AR3 200
Seat height700 mm700 mm
Wheelbase1,560 mm1,751 mm
Wet weight--
Displacement299 cc190 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Adiva AD3 300
Sport (58.3 deg)
Adiva AR3 200
Sport (58.8 deg)

Hip angle

Adiva AD3 300
Neutral (91.5 deg)
Adiva AR3 200
Neutral (87.6 deg)

Elbow angle

Adiva AD3 300
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Adiva AR3 200
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Adiva AD3 300
Neutral (13.7 deg)
Adiva AR3 200
Neutral (16.3 deg)