three-wheeler / default rider 183 cm
Adiva AD3 300 vs Adiva AR3 200 ergonomics
Adiva AD3 300 and Adiva AR3 200 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Adiva AD3 300
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Adiva AR3 200
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Adiva AD3 300 has a 700 mm seat; the Adiva AR3 200 sits at 700 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 70 cm for the Adiva AD3 300 and 70 cm for the Adiva AR3 200.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Adiva AD3 300 | Adiva AR3 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 700 mm | 700 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,560 mm | 1,751 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 299 cc | 190 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Adiva AD3 300
- Sport (58.3 deg)
- Adiva AR3 200
- Sport (58.8 deg)
Hip angle
- Adiva AD3 300
- Neutral (91.5 deg)
- Adiva AR3 200
- Neutral (87.6 deg)
Elbow angle
- Adiva AD3 300
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Adiva AR3 200
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Adiva AD3 300
- Neutral (13.7 deg)
- Adiva AR3 200
- Neutral (16.3 deg)