cafe-racer / default rider 183 cm
AJS Motorcycles Cadwell 125 vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 250 ergonomics
AJS Motorcycles Cadwell 125 and Royal Enfield Continental GT 250 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
AJS Motorcycles Cadwell 125
All contacts reached
Royal Enfield Continental GT 250
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The AJS Motorcycles Cadwell 125 lists a 740 mm seat; the Royal Enfield Continental GT 250 lists 737 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | AJS Motorcycles Cadwell 125 | Royal Enfield Continental GT 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 740 mm | 737 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,330 mm | 1,321 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 136 kg |
| Displacement | 124 cc | 248 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- AJS Motorcycles Cadwell 125
- Sport (57.8 deg)
- Royal Enfield Continental GT 250
- Sport (57.8 deg)
Hip angle
- AJS Motorcycles Cadwell 125
- Neutral (96.6 deg)
- Royal Enfield Continental GT 250
- Neutral (96.9 deg)
Elbow angle
- AJS Motorcycles Cadwell 125
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Royal Enfield Continental GT 250
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- AJS Motorcycles Cadwell 125
- Neutral (10.3 deg)
- Royal Enfield Continental GT 250
- Neutral (10.1 deg)