electric / default rider 183 cm
Alta Motors Redshift EXR vs KTM Freeride E ergonomics
Alta Motors Redshift EXR and KTM Freeride E land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Alta Motors Redshift EXR
All contacts reached
KTM Freeride E
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Alta Motors Redshift EXR has a 927 mm seat; the KTM Freeride E sits at 909 mm — a 18 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 93 cm for the Alta Motors Redshift EXR and 91 cm for the KTM Freeride E.
That makes the KTM Freeride E the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Alta Motors Redshift EXR gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Alta Motors Redshift EXR | KTM Freeride E |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 927 mm | 909 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,492 mm | 1,455 mm |
| Wet weight | 124 kg | 112 kg |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Alta Motors Redshift EXR
- Sport (58.2 deg)
- KTM Freeride E
- Sport (58.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Alta Motors Redshift EXR
- Neutral (93.0 deg)
- KTM Freeride E
- Neutral (93.9 deg)
Elbow angle
- Alta Motors Redshift EXR
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- KTM Freeride E
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Alta Motors Redshift EXR
- Neutral (12.7 deg)
- KTM Freeride E
- Neutral (12.1 deg)