electric / default rider 183 cm
Alta Motors Redshift EXR vs Stark Future Varg SM ergonomics
Alta Motors Redshift EXR and Stark Future Varg SM land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Alta Motors Redshift EXR
All contacts reached
Stark Future Varg SM
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Alta Motors Redshift EXR has a 927 mm seat; the Stark Future Varg SM sits at 935 mm — a 8 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 93 cm for the Alta Motors Redshift EXR and 94 cm for the Stark Future Varg SM.
That makes the Alta Motors Redshift EXR the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Stark Future Varg SM gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Alta Motors Redshift EXR | Stark Future Varg SM |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 927 mm | 935 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,492 mm | 1,471 mm |
| Wet weight | 124 kg | 125 kg |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Alta Motors Redshift EXR
- Sport (58.2 deg)
- Stark Future Varg SM
- Sport (58.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Alta Motors Redshift EXR
- Neutral (93.0 deg)
- Stark Future Varg SM
- Neutral (93.6 deg)
Elbow angle
- Alta Motors Redshift EXR
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Stark Future Varg SM
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Alta Motors Redshift EXR
- Neutral (12.7 deg)
- Stark Future Varg SM
- Neutral (12.3 deg)