electric / default rider 183 cm
Bajaj Chetak C3501 vs TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh ergonomics
Bajaj Chetak C3501 and TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Bajaj Chetak C3501
All contacts reached
TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Bajaj Chetak C3501 has a 775 mm seat; the TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh sits at 770 mm — a 5 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 78 cm for the Bajaj Chetak C3501 and 77 cm for the TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh.
That makes the TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Bajaj Chetak C3501 gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Bajaj Chetak C3501 | TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 775 mm | 770 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,355 mm | 1,301 mm |
| Wet weight | 125 kg | 132 kg |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Bajaj Chetak C3501
- Sport (57.8 deg)
- TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh
- Sport (57.7 deg)
Hip angle
- Bajaj Chetak C3501
- Neutral (96.1 deg)
- TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh
- Neutral (97.3 deg)
Elbow angle
- Bajaj Chetak C3501
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Bajaj Chetak C3501
- Neutral (10.6 deg)
- TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh
- Neutral (9.8 deg)