naked / default rider 183 cm
Bajaj Pulsar N250 vs Benelli 302S ergonomics
Bajaj Pulsar N250 and Benelli 302S have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Bajaj Pulsar N250
All contacts reached
Benelli 302S
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Bajaj Pulsar N250 lists a 795 mm seat; the Benelli 302S lists 795 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Bajaj Pulsar N250 | Benelli 302S |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 795 mm | 795 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,351 mm | 1,410 mm |
| Wet weight | 162 kg | 198 kg |
| Displacement | 249 cc | 300 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Bajaj Pulsar N250
- Sport (61.4 deg)
- Benelli 302S
- Sport (61.6 deg)
Hip angle
- Bajaj Pulsar N250
- Neutral (93.9 deg)
- Benelli 302S
- Neutral (92.4 deg)
Elbow angle
- Bajaj Pulsar N250
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Benelli 302S
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Bajaj Pulsar N250
- Neutral (11.3 deg)
- Benelli 302S
- Neutral (12.3 deg)