naked / default rider 183 cm
Bajaj Pulsar N250 vs Benelli 302S ergonomics
Bajaj Pulsar N250 and Benelli 302S land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Bajaj Pulsar N250
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Benelli 302S
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Bajaj Pulsar N250 has a 795 mm seat; the Benelli 302S sits at 795 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 80 cm for the Bajaj Pulsar N250 and 80 cm for the Benelli 302S.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Bajaj Pulsar N250 | Benelli 302S |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 795 mm | 795 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,351 mm | 1,410 mm |
| Wet weight | 162 kg | 198 kg |
| Displacement | 249 cc | 300 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Bajaj Pulsar N250
- Sport (61.4 deg)
- Benelli 302S
- Sport (61.6 deg)
Hip angle
- Bajaj Pulsar N250
- Neutral (93.9 deg)
- Benelli 302S
- Neutral (92.4 deg)
Elbow angle
- Bajaj Pulsar N250
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Benelli 302S
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Bajaj Pulsar N250
- Neutral (11.3 deg)
- Benelli 302S
- Neutral (12.3 deg)