naked / default rider 183 cm
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z vs Triumph Tracker 400 ergonomics
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z and Triumph Tracker 400 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Triumph Tracker 400
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z has a 805 mm seat; the Triumph Tracker 400 sits at 805 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 81 cm for the Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z and 81 cm for the Triumph Tracker 400.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z | Triumph Tracker 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 805 mm | 805 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,344 mm | 1,371 mm |
| Wet weight | 174 kg | 173 kg |
| Displacement | 373 cc | 398 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
- Sport (61.4 deg)
- Triumph Tracker 400
- Sport (61.4 deg)
Hip angle
- Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
- Neutral (94.1 deg)
- Triumph Tracker 400
- Neutral (93.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Tracker 400
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
- Neutral (11.1 deg)
- Triumph Tracker 400
- Neutral (11.6 deg)