sport / default rider 183 cm
Benelli 302R vs Honda CBR400R ergonomics
Benelli 302R and Honda CBR400R have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Benelli 302R
All contacts reached
Honda CBR400R
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Benelli 302R lists a 785 mm seat; the Honda CBR400R lists 785 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Benelli 302R | Honda CBR400R |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 785 mm | 785 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,410 mm | 1,410 mm |
| Wet weight | 198 kg | 191 kg |
| Displacement | 300 cc | 399 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Benelli 302R
- Sport (60.7 deg)
- Honda CBR400R
- Sport (60.7 deg)
Hip angle
- Benelli 302R
- Neutral (99.5 deg)
- Honda CBR400R
- Neutral (99.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- Benelli 302R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Honda CBR400R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Benelli 302R
- Forward (25.5 deg)
- Honda CBR400R
- Forward (25.5 deg)