Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

naked / default rider 183 cm

Benelli 302S vs CFMoto 650NK ergonomics

Benelli 302S and CFMoto 650NK have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.

Modeled fit comparison

Benelli 302S

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

CFMoto 650NK

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Benelli 302S lists a 795 mm seat; the CFMoto 650NK lists 795 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Benelli 302S and CFMoto 650NK
SpecBenelli 302SCFMoto 650NK
Seat height795 mm795 mm
Wheelbase1,410 mm1,415 mm
Wet weight198 kg206 kg
Displacement300 cc649 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Benelli 302S
Sport (61.6 deg)
CFMoto 650NK
Sport (61.6 deg)

Hip angle

Benelli 302S
Neutral (92.4 deg)
CFMoto 650NK
Neutral (92.4 deg)

Elbow angle

Benelli 302S
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
CFMoto 650NK
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Benelli 302S
Neutral (12.3 deg)
CFMoto 650NK
Neutral (12.3 deg)