naked / default rider 183 cm
Benelli 302S vs CFMoto 800NK ergonomics
Benelli 302S and CFMoto 800NK have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Benelli 302S
All contacts reached
CFMoto 800NK
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Benelli 302S lists a 795 mm seat; the CFMoto 800NK lists 795 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Benelli 302S | CFMoto 800NK |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 795 mm | 795 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,410 mm | 1,415 mm |
| Wet weight | 198 kg | 186 kg |
| Displacement | 300 cc | 799 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Benelli 302S
- Sport (61.6 deg)
- CFMoto 800NK
- Sport (61.6 deg)
Hip angle
- Benelli 302S
- Neutral (92.4 deg)
- CFMoto 800NK
- Neutral (92.4 deg)
Elbow angle
- Benelli 302S
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- CFMoto 800NK
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Benelli 302S
- Neutral (12.3 deg)
- CFMoto 800NK
- Neutral (12.3 deg)