naked / default rider 183 cm
Benelli 302S vs CFMoto 800NK ergonomics
Benelli 302S and CFMoto 800NK land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Benelli 302S
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
CFMoto 800NK
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Benelli 302S has a 795 mm seat; the CFMoto 800NK sits at 795 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 80 cm for the Benelli 302S and 80 cm for the CFMoto 800NK.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Benelli 302S | CFMoto 800NK |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 795 mm | 795 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,410 mm | 1,415 mm |
| Wet weight | 198 kg | 186 kg |
| Displacement | 300 cc | 799 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Benelli 302S
- Sport (61.6 deg)
- CFMoto 800NK
- Sport (61.6 deg)
Hip angle
- Benelli 302S
- Neutral (92.4 deg)
- CFMoto 800NK
- Neutral (92.4 deg)
Elbow angle
- Benelli 302S
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- CFMoto 800NK
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Benelli 302S
- Neutral (12.3 deg)
- CFMoto 800NK
- Neutral (12.3 deg)