naked / default rider 183 cm
Benelli 302S vs Honda 919 ergonomics
Benelli 302S and Honda 919 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Benelli 302S
All contacts reached
Honda 919
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Benelli 302S lists a 795 mm seat; the Honda 919 lists 795 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Benelli 302S | Honda 919 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 795 mm | 795 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,410 mm | 1,460 mm |
| Wet weight | 198 kg | - |
| Displacement | 300 cc | 919 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Benelli 302S
- Sport (61.6 deg)
- Honda 919
- Sport (61.8 deg)
Hip angle
- Benelli 302S
- Neutral (92.4 deg)
- Honda 919
- Neutral (91.2 deg)
Elbow angle
- Benelli 302S
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Honda 919
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Benelli 302S
- Neutral (12.3 deg)
- Honda 919
- Neutral (13.1 deg)