naked / default rider 183 cm
Benelli 302S vs Honda 919 ergonomics
Benelli 302S and Honda 919 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Benelli 302S
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Honda 919
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Benelli 302S has a 795 mm seat; the Honda 919 sits at 795 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 80 cm for the Benelli 302S and 80 cm for the Honda 919.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Benelli 302S | Honda 919 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 795 mm | 795 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,410 mm | 1,460 mm |
| Wet weight | 198 kg | - |
| Displacement | 300 cc | 919 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Benelli 302S
- Sport (61.6 deg)
- Honda 919
- Sport (61.8 deg)
Hip angle
- Benelli 302S
- Neutral (92.4 deg)
- Honda 919
- Neutral (91.2 deg)
Elbow angle
- Benelli 302S
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Honda 919
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Benelli 302S
- Neutral (12.3 deg)
- Honda 919
- Neutral (13.1 deg)