Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

cruiser / default rider 183 cm

Benelli 502C vs Royal Enfield Meteor 350 ergonomics

Royal Enfield Meteor 350 scores 95 vs 92 for the default rider, making it the stronger ergonomic fit than Benelli 502C in this comparison.

Fit verdict

Benelli 502C

92Comfortable

All contacts reached

Royal Enfield Meteor 350

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Royal Enfield Meteor 350 has the stronger default-rider fit in this generated comparison.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Benelli 502C has a 760 mm seat; the Royal Enfield Meteor 350 sits at 765 mm — a 5 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 76 cm for the Benelli 502C and 77 cm for the Royal Enfield Meteor 350.

That makes the Benelli 502C the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Royal Enfield Meteor 350 gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Benelli 502C and Royal Enfield Meteor 350
SpecBenelli 502CRoyal Enfield Meteor 350
Seat height760 mm765 mm
Wheelbase1,580 mm1,400 mm
Wet weight220 kg191 kg
Displacement500 cc349 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Benelli 502C
Open (114.5 deg)
Royal Enfield Meteor 350
Neutral (101.1 deg)

Hip angle

Benelli 502C
Sport (79.0 deg)
Royal Enfield Meteor 350
Sport (78.2 deg)

Elbow angle

Benelli 502C
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Royal Enfield Meteor 350
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Benelli 502C
Neutral (9.1 deg)
Royal Enfield Meteor 350
Neutral (6.2 deg)