cruiser / default rider 183 cm
Benelli 502C vs Royal Enfield Meteor 350 ergonomics
Royal Enfield Meteor 350 scores 95 vs 92 for the default rider, making it the stronger ergonomic fit than Benelli 502C in this comparison.
Fit verdict
Benelli 502C
All contacts reached
Royal Enfield Meteor 350
All contacts reached
Royal Enfield Meteor 350 has the stronger default-rider fit in this generated comparison.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Benelli 502C has a 760 mm seat; the Royal Enfield Meteor 350 sits at 765 mm — a 5 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 76 cm for the Benelli 502C and 77 cm for the Royal Enfield Meteor 350.
That makes the Benelli 502C the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Royal Enfield Meteor 350 gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Benelli 502C | Royal Enfield Meteor 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 760 mm | 765 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,580 mm | 1,400 mm |
| Wet weight | 220 kg | 191 kg |
| Displacement | 500 cc | 349 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Benelli 502C
- Open (114.5 deg)
- Royal Enfield Meteor 350
- Neutral (101.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Benelli 502C
- Sport (79.0 deg)
- Royal Enfield Meteor 350
- Sport (78.2 deg)
Elbow angle
- Benelli 502C
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Royal Enfield Meteor 350
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Benelli 502C
- Neutral (9.1 deg)
- Royal Enfield Meteor 350
- Neutral (6.2 deg)