adventure / default rider 183 cm
Benelli TRK 251 vs BMW G 650 GS ergonomics
Benelli TRK 251 and BMW G 650 GS land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Benelli TRK 251
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
BMW G 650 GS
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Benelli TRK 251 has a 800 mm seat; the BMW G 650 GS sits at 800 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 80 cm for the Benelli TRK 251 and 80 cm for the BMW G 650 GS.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Benelli TRK 251 | BMW G 650 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 800 mm | 800 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,390 mm | 1,477 mm |
| Wet weight | 164 kg | 192 kg |
| Displacement | 249 cc | 652 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Benelli TRK 251
- Sport (65.3 deg)
- BMW G 650 GS
- Sport (65.5 deg)
Hip angle
- Benelli TRK 251
- Neutral (103.2 deg)
- BMW G 650 GS
- Neutral (101.4 deg)
Elbow angle
- Benelli TRK 251
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- BMW G 650 GS
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Benelli TRK 251
- Neutral (8.3 deg)
- BMW G 650 GS
- Neutral (9.5 deg)