adventure / default rider 183 cm
Benelli TRK 251 vs CFMoto Ibex 450 ergonomics
Benelli TRK 251 and CFMoto Ibex 450 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Benelli TRK 251
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
CFMoto Ibex 450
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Benelli TRK 251 has a 800 mm seat; the CFMoto Ibex 450 sits at 800 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 80 cm for the Benelli TRK 251 and 80 cm for the CFMoto Ibex 450.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Benelli TRK 251 | CFMoto Ibex 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 800 mm | 800 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,390 mm | 1,505 mm |
| Wet weight | 164 kg | 193 kg |
| Displacement | 249 cc | 449 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Benelli TRK 251
- Sport (65.3 deg)
- CFMoto Ibex 450
- Sport (65.5 deg)
Hip angle
- Benelli TRK 251
- Neutral (103.2 deg)
- CFMoto Ibex 450
- Neutral (100.7 deg)
Elbow angle
- Benelli TRK 251
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- CFMoto Ibex 450
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Benelli TRK 251
- Neutral (8.3 deg)
- CFMoto Ibex 450
- Neutral (10.0 deg)