adventure / default rider 183 cm
Benelli TRK 502 vs QJ Motor SVT 650 ergonomics
Benelli TRK 502 and QJ Motor SVT 650 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Benelli TRK 502
All contacts reached
QJ Motor SVT 650
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Benelli TRK 502 has a 800 mm seat; the QJ Motor SVT 650 sits at 795 mm — a 5 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 80 cm for the Benelli TRK 502 and 80 cm for the QJ Motor SVT 650.
That makes the QJ Motor SVT 650 the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Benelli TRK 502 gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Benelli TRK 502 | QJ Motor SVT 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 800 mm | 795 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,525 mm | 1,505 mm |
| Wet weight | 235 kg | 236 kg |
| Displacement | 500 cc | 645 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Benelli TRK 502
- Sport (65.6 deg)
- QJ Motor SVT 650
- Sport (65.5 deg)
Hip angle
- Benelli TRK 502
- Neutral (100.3 deg)
- QJ Motor SVT 650
- Neutral (100.7 deg)
Elbow angle
- Benelli TRK 502
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- QJ Motor SVT 650
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Benelli TRK 502
- Neutral (10.3 deg)
- QJ Motor SVT 650
- Neutral (10.0 deg)