adventure / default rider 183 cm
Benelli TRK 702 vs BMW G 310 GS ergonomics
Benelli TRK 702 and BMW G 310 GS have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Benelli TRK 702
All contacts reached
BMW G 310 GS
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Benelli TRK 702 lists a 835 mm seat; the BMW G 310 GS lists 835 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Benelli TRK 702 | BMW G 310 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 835 mm | 835 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,505 mm | 1,420 mm |
| Wet weight | 235 kg | 175 kg |
| Displacement | 698 cc | 313 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Benelli TRK 702
- Sport (65.5 deg)
- BMW G 310 GS
- Sport (65.4 deg)
Hip angle
- Benelli TRK 702
- Neutral (100.7 deg)
- BMW G 310 GS
- Neutral (102.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- Benelli TRK 702
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- BMW G 310 GS
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Benelli TRK 702
- Neutral (10.0 deg)
- BMW G 310 GS
- Neutral (8.7 deg)