adventure / default rider 183 cm
Benelli TRK 702 vs BMW G 310 GS ergonomics
Benelli TRK 702 and BMW G 310 GS land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Benelli TRK 702
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
BMW G 310 GS
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Benelli TRK 702 has a 835 mm seat; the BMW G 310 GS sits at 835 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 84 cm for the Benelli TRK 702 and 84 cm for the BMW G 310 GS.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Benelli TRK 702 | BMW G 310 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 835 mm | 835 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,505 mm | 1,420 mm |
| Wet weight | 235 kg | 175 kg |
| Displacement | 698 cc | 313 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Benelli TRK 702
- Sport (65.5 deg)
- BMW G 310 GS
- Sport (65.4 deg)
Hip angle
- Benelli TRK 702
- Neutral (100.7 deg)
- BMW G 310 GS
- Neutral (102.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- Benelli TRK 702
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- BMW G 310 GS
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Benelli TRK 702
- Neutral (10.0 deg)
- BMW G 310 GS
- Neutral (8.7 deg)