Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

adventure / default rider 183 cm

Benelli TRK 702 vs Suzuki V-Strom 650 ergonomics

Benelli TRK 702 and Suzuki V-Strom 650 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.

Posture overlay

The default rider's modeled seated posture on each bike, solved from the same geometry as the score panels and overlaid on one ground line so seat height and reach differences are visible at a glance.

Try with my height

Modeled fit comparison

Benelli TRK 702

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Suzuki V-Strom 650

Modeled scorePartially verified
96Comfortable

All contacts reached

The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Benelli TRK 702 lists a 835 mm seat; the Suzuki V-Strom 650 lists 835 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Benelli TRK 702 and Suzuki V-Strom 650
SpecBenelli TRK 702Suzuki V-Strom 650
Seat height835 mm835 mm
Wheelbase1,505 mm1,560 mm
Wet weight235 kg213 kg
Displacement698 cc645 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Benelli TRK 702
Sport (65.5 deg)
Suzuki V-Strom 650
Neutral (79.7 deg)

Hip angle

Benelli TRK 702
Neutral (100.7 deg)
Suzuki V-Strom 650
Open (132.9 deg)

Elbow angle

Benelli TRK 702
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Suzuki V-Strom 650
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Benelli TRK 702
Neutral (10.0 deg)
Suzuki V-Strom 650
Neutral (10.1 deg)

Fit by rider height

Modeled ground contact by rider height, in 5 bands from 5'2" to 6'4" (158-193 cm).

Modeled foot contact for Benelli TRK 702 and Suzuki V-Strom 650 by rider height
Rider heightBenelli TRK 702Suzuki V-Strom 650
158 cm / 5'2"Tiptoe onlyTiptoe only
167 cm / 5'6"Balls of feetBalls of feet
176 cm / 5'9"Balls of feetBalls of feet
184 cm / 6'0"Both feet flatBoth feet flat
193 cm / 6'4"Both feet flatBoth feet flat

Modeled from each bike's seat height and a typical inseam-to-height ratio only — not a flat-footing guarantee. Real ground contact still depends on seat shape, suspension sag, footwear, and your own proportions. Confirm on the motorcycle.

Verdict

Benelli TRK 702 and Suzuki V-Strom 650 are both adventure bikes, so the practical question is which of their real differences you'd actually feel. Suzuki V-Strom 650 is about 22 kg lighter wet than Benelli TRK 702, which tends to show up most when paddling backward out of a parking spot or picking the bike up off the sidestand. The modeled knee angle differs by 14° between the two, with Suzuki V-Strom 650 opening the knee further — a more stretched-out leg position than Benelli TRK 702's. Suzuki V-Strom 650 runs a 55 mm longer wheelbase than Benelli TRK 702, which typically trades some low-speed agility for extra stability at speed. None of that adds up to a clear overall winner in the modeled posture score, so the individual differences above are the more useful comparison than the headline number. Treat every figure here as a planning estimate: seat width, suspension sag, footwear, and your own proportions can shift the real feel more than a few millimetres or degrees on paper. Load your height and inseam into the simulator, then sit on both before you decide.

Kit out either bike

Related comparisons

See all adventure comparisons ->