adventure / default rider 183 cm
Benelli TRK 702 vs BMW F 750 GS ergonomics
Benelli TRK 702 and BMW F 750 GS have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Benelli TRK 702
All contacts reached
BMW F 750 GS
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Benelli TRK 702 lists a 810 mm seat; the BMW F 750 GS lists 815 mm — a 5 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
On seat height alone, the Benelli TRK 702 has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Benelli TRK 702 | BMW F 750 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 810 mm | 815 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,505 mm | 1,559 mm |
| Wet weight | 219 kg | 224 kg |
| Displacement | 698 cc | 853 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Benelli TRK 702
- Sport (65.5 deg)
- BMW F 750 GS
- Sport (65.7 deg)
Hip angle
- Benelli TRK 702
- Neutral (100.7 deg)
- BMW F 750 GS
- Neutral (99.6 deg)
Elbow angle
- Benelli TRK 702
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- BMW F 750 GS
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Benelli TRK 702
- Neutral (10.0 deg)
- BMW F 750 GS
- Neutral (10.7 deg)