adventure / default rider 183 cm
Benelli TRK 702 vs BMW F 750 GS ergonomics
Benelli TRK 702 and BMW F 750 GS land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Benelli TRK 702
All contacts reached
BMW F 750 GS
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Benelli TRK 702 has a 810 mm seat; the BMW F 750 GS sits at 815 mm — a 5 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 81 cm for the Benelli TRK 702 and 82 cm for the BMW F 750 GS.
That makes the Benelli TRK 702 the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the BMW F 750 GS gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Benelli TRK 702 | BMW F 750 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 810 mm | 815 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,505 mm | 1,559 mm |
| Wet weight | 219 kg | 224 kg |
| Displacement | 698 cc | 853 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Benelli TRK 702
- Sport (65.5 deg)
- BMW F 750 GS
- Sport (65.7 deg)
Hip angle
- Benelli TRK 702
- Neutral (100.7 deg)
- BMW F 750 GS
- Neutral (99.6 deg)
Elbow angle
- Benelli TRK 702
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- BMW F 750 GS
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Benelli TRK 702
- Neutral (10.0 deg)
- BMW F 750 GS
- Neutral (10.7 deg)