adventure / default rider 183 cm
Benelli TRK 702 vs QJ Motor SRT 600 S ergonomics
Benelli TRK 702 and QJ Motor SRT 600 S land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Benelli TRK 702
All contacts reached
QJ Motor SRT 600 S
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Benelli TRK 702 has a 810 mm seat; the QJ Motor SRT 600 S sits at 805 mm — a 5 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 81 cm for the Benelli TRK 702 and 81 cm for the QJ Motor SRT 600 S.
That makes the QJ Motor SRT 600 S the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Benelli TRK 702 gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Benelli TRK 702 | QJ Motor SRT 600 S |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 810 mm | 805 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,505 mm | 1,480 mm |
| Wet weight | 219 kg | 236 kg |
| Displacement | 698 cc | 554 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Benelli TRK 702
- Sport (65.5 deg)
- QJ Motor SRT 600 S
- Sport (65.5 deg)
Hip angle
- Benelli TRK 702
- Neutral (100.7 deg)
- QJ Motor SRT 600 S
- Neutral (101.2 deg)
Elbow angle
- Benelli TRK 702
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- QJ Motor SRT 600 S
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Benelli TRK 702
- Neutral (10.0 deg)
- QJ Motor SRT 600 S
- Neutral (9.6 deg)