enduro / default rider 183 cm
Beta Motor 200 RR vs Beta Motor 300 RR ergonomics
Beta Motor 200 RR and Beta Motor 300 RR have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Beta Motor 200 RR
All contacts reached
Beta Motor 300 RR
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Beta Motor 200 RR lists a 930 mm seat; the Beta Motor 300 RR lists 930 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Beta Motor 200 RR | Beta Motor 300 RR |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 930 mm | 930 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,476 mm | 1,481 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 190 cc | 293 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Beta Motor 200 RR
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Beta Motor 300 RR
- Sport (58.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Beta Motor 200 RR
- Neutral (93.3 deg)
- Beta Motor 300 RR
- Neutral (93.4 deg)
Elbow angle
- Beta Motor 200 RR
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Beta Motor 300 RR
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Beta Motor 200 RR
- Neutral (12.4 deg)
- Beta Motor 300 RR
- Neutral (12.5 deg)