dual-sport / default rider 183 cm
Beta Motor Alp 200 vs Honda CRF300LS ergonomics
Beta Motor Alp 200 and Honda CRF300LS land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Beta Motor Alp 200
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Honda CRF300LS
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Beta Motor Alp 200 has a 830 mm seat; the Honda CRF300LS sits at 831 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 83 cm for the Beta Motor Alp 200 and 83 cm for the Honda CRF300LS.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Beta Motor Alp 200 | Honda CRF300LS |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 830 mm | 831 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,370 mm | 1,440 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 141 kg |
| Displacement | 199 cc | 286 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Beta Motor Alp 200
- Sport (67.4 deg)
- Honda CRF300LS
- Sport (67.5 deg)
Hip angle
- Beta Motor Alp 200
- Neutral (109.3 deg)
- Honda CRF300LS
- Neutral (107.9 deg)
Elbow angle
- Beta Motor Alp 200
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Honda CRF300LS
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Beta Motor Alp 200
- Neutral (5.3 deg)
- Honda CRF300LS
- Neutral (6.4 deg)