dual-sport / default rider 183 cm
Beta Motor Alp 200 vs Honda CRF300LS ergonomics
Beta Motor Alp 200 and Honda CRF300LS have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Beta Motor Alp 200
All contacts reached
Honda CRF300LS
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Beta Motor Alp 200 lists a 830 mm seat; the Honda CRF300LS lists 831 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Beta Motor Alp 200 | Honda CRF300LS |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 830 mm | 831 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,370 mm | 1,440 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 141 kg |
| Displacement | 199 cc | 286 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Beta Motor Alp 200
- Sport (67.4 deg)
- Honda CRF300LS
- Sport (67.5 deg)
Hip angle
- Beta Motor Alp 200
- Neutral (109.3 deg)
- Honda CRF300LS
- Neutral (107.9 deg)
Elbow angle
- Beta Motor Alp 200
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Honda CRF300LS
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Beta Motor Alp 200
- Neutral (5.3 deg)
- Honda CRF300LS
- Neutral (6.4 deg)