enduro / default rider 183 cm
Beta Motor RR 400 vs Beta Motor RR 525 Enduro ergonomics
Beta Motor RR 400 and Beta Motor RR 525 Enduro have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Beta Motor RR 400
All contacts reached
Beta Motor RR 525 Enduro
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Beta Motor RR 400 lists a 940 mm seat; the Beta Motor RR 525 Enduro lists 940 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Beta Motor RR 400 | Beta Motor RR 525 Enduro |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 940 mm | 940 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,500 mm | 1,490 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 398 cc | 510 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Beta Motor RR 400
- Sport (58.2 deg)
- Beta Motor RR 525 Enduro
- Sport (58.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Beta Motor RR 400
- Neutral (92.9 deg)
- Beta Motor RR 525 Enduro
- Neutral (93.2 deg)
Elbow angle
- Beta Motor RR 400
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Beta Motor RR 525 Enduro
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Beta Motor RR 400
- Neutral (12.8 deg)
- Beta Motor RR 525 Enduro
- Neutral (12.6 deg)