Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

enduro / default rider 183 cm

Beta Motor RR Race 2T 300 vs GasGas EC 300 ergonomics

Beta Motor RR Race 2T 300 and GasGas EC 300 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.

Modeled fit comparison

Beta Motor RR Race 2T 300

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

GasGas EC 300

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Beta Motor RR Race 2T 300 lists a 950 mm seat; the GasGas EC 300 lists 950 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Beta Motor RR Race 2T 300 and GasGas EC 300
SpecBeta Motor RR Race 2T 300GasGas EC 300
Seat height950 mm950 mm
Wheelbase1,482 mm1,483 mm
Wet weight--
Displacement293 cc299 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Beta Motor RR Race 2T 300
Sport (58.1 deg)
GasGas EC 300
Sport (58.1 deg)

Hip angle

Beta Motor RR Race 2T 300
Neutral (93.3 deg)
GasGas EC 300
Neutral (93.4 deg)

Elbow angle

Beta Motor RR Race 2T 300
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
GasGas EC 300
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Beta Motor RR Race 2T 300
Neutral (12.5 deg)
GasGas EC 300
Neutral (12.5 deg)