Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

enduro / default rider 183 cm

Beta Motor RR X-Pro 2T 250 vs Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350 ergonomics

Beta Motor RR X-Pro 2T 250 and Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.

Fit verdict

Beta Motor RR X-Pro 2T 250

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Beta Motor RR X-Pro 2T 250 and Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350
SpecBeta Motor RR X-Pro 2T 250Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350
Seat height930 mm930 mm
Wheelbase1,482 mm1,480 mm
Wet weight--
Displacement249 cc350 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Beta Motor RR X-Pro 2T 250
Sport (58.1 deg)
Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350
Sport (58.1 deg)

Hip angle

Beta Motor RR X-Pro 2T 250
Neutral (93.3 deg)
Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350
Neutral (93.3 deg)

Elbow angle

Beta Motor RR X-Pro 2T 250
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Beta Motor RR X-Pro 2T 250
Neutral (12.5 deg)
Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350
Neutral (12.5 deg)