Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

enduro / default rider 183 cm

Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350 vs Rieju MR Ranger 300 ergonomics

Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350 and Rieju MR Ranger 300 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.

Modeled fit comparison

Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Rieju MR Ranger 300

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350 lists a 930 mm seat; the Rieju MR Ranger 300 lists 928 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350 and Rieju MR Ranger 300
SpecBeta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350Rieju MR Ranger 300
Seat height930 mm928 mm
Wheelbase1,480 mm1,480 mm
Wet weight--
Displacement350 cc299 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350
Sport (58.1 deg)
Rieju MR Ranger 300
Sport (58.1 deg)

Hip angle

Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350
Neutral (93.3 deg)
Rieju MR Ranger 300
Neutral (93.3 deg)

Elbow angle

Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Rieju MR Ranger 300
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Beta Motor RR X-Pro 4T 350
Neutral (12.5 deg)
Rieju MR Ranger 300
Neutral (12.5 deg)