scooter / default rider 183 cm
BMW C 400 GT vs TVS Motor NTorq 125 ergonomics
BMW C 400 GT and TVS Motor NTorq 125 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
BMW C 400 GT
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
TVS Motor NTorq 125
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW C 400 GT | TVS Motor NTorq 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 775 mm | 770 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,565 mm | 1,285 mm |
| Wet weight | 214 kg | 111 kg |
| Displacement | 350 cc | 125 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW C 400 GT
- Sport (58.3 deg)
- TVS Motor NTorq 125
- Sport (57.7 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW C 400 GT
- Neutral (91.6 deg)
- TVS Motor NTorq 125
- Neutral (97.6 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW C 400 GT
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- TVS Motor NTorq 125
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW C 400 GT
- Neutral (13.7 deg)
- TVS Motor NTorq 125
- Neutral (9.6 deg)