scooter / default rider 183 cm
BMW C 400 GT vs Honda PCX160 ergonomics
BMW C 400 GT and Honda PCX160 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
BMW C 400 GT
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Honda PCX160
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW C 400 GT has a 765 mm seat; the Honda PCX160 sits at 764 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 77 cm for the BMW C 400 GT and 76 cm for the Honda PCX160.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW C 400 GT | Honda PCX160 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 765 mm | 764 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,565 mm | 1,313 mm |
| Wet weight | 219 kg | 132 kg |
| Displacement | 350 cc | 157 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW C 400 GT
- Sport (58.3 deg)
- Honda PCX160
- Sport (57.7 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW C 400 GT
- Neutral (91.6 deg)
- Honda PCX160
- Neutral (97.1 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW C 400 GT
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Honda PCX160
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW C 400 GT
- Neutral (13.7 deg)
- Honda PCX160
- Neutral (10.0 deg)