scooter / default rider 183 cm
BMW C 650 GT vs Yamaha XMAX 400 ergonomics
BMW C 650 GT and Yamaha XMAX 400 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
BMW C 650 GT
All contacts reached
Yamaha XMAX 400
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW C 650 GT lists a 805 mm seat; the Yamaha XMAX 400 lists 800 mm — a 5 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
On seat height alone, the Yamaha XMAX 400 has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW C 650 GT | Yamaha XMAX 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 805 mm | 800 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,591 mm | 1,567 mm |
| Wet weight | 261 kg | 210 kg |
| Displacement | 647 cc | 395 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW C 650 GT
- Sport (58.4 deg)
- Yamaha XMAX 400
- Sport (58.3 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW C 650 GT
- Neutral (91.0 deg)
- Yamaha XMAX 400
- Neutral (91.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW C 650 GT
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Yamaha XMAX 400
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW C 650 GT
- Neutral (14.0 deg)
- Yamaha XMAX 400
- Neutral (13.7 deg)