electric / default rider 183 cm
BMW C Evolution vs Suzuki e-Address ergonomics
BMW C Evolution and Suzuki e-Address have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
BMW C Evolution
All contacts reached
Suzuki e-Address
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW C Evolution lists a 765 mm seat; the Suzuki e-Address lists 765 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW C Evolution | Suzuki e-Address |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 765 mm | 765 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,610 mm | 1,305 mm |
| Wet weight | 275 kg | 122 kg |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW C Evolution
- Sport (58.5 deg)
- Suzuki e-Address
- Sport (57.7 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW C Evolution
- Neutral (90.5 deg)
- Suzuki e-Address
- Neutral (97.2 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW C Evolution
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki e-Address
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW C Evolution
- Neutral (14.4 deg)
- Suzuki e-Address
- Neutral (9.9 deg)