electric / default rider 183 cm
BMW CE 04 vs Horwin EK3 Plus ergonomics
BMW CE 04 and Horwin EK3 Plus have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
BMW CE 04
All contacts reached
Horwin EK3 Plus
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW CE 04 lists a 780 mm seat; the Horwin EK3 Plus lists 780 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW CE 04 | Horwin EK3 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 780 mm | 780 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,675 mm | 1,360 mm |
| Wet weight | 231 kg | - |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW CE 04
- Sport (58.6 deg)
- Horwin EK3 Plus
- Sport (57.9 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW CE 04
- Neutral (89.2 deg)
- Horwin EK3 Plus
- Neutral (95.9 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW CE 04
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Horwin EK3 Plus
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW CE 04
- Neutral (15.3 deg)
- Horwin EK3 Plus
- Neutral (10.7 deg)