adventure / default rider 183 cm
BMW G 310 GS vs QJ Motor SRT 900 SX ergonomics
BMW G 310 GS and QJ Motor SRT 900 SX land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
BMW G 310 GS
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
QJ Motor SRT 900 SX
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW G 310 GS | QJ Motor SRT 900 SX |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 835 mm | 835 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,420 mm | 1,540 mm |
| Wet weight | 175 kg | 264 kg |
| Displacement | 313 cc | 904 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW G 310 GS
- Sport (65.4 deg)
- QJ Motor SRT 900 SX
- Sport (65.6 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW G 310 GS
- Neutral (102.5 deg)
- QJ Motor SRT 900 SX
- Neutral (100.0 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW G 310 GS
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- QJ Motor SRT 900 SX
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW G 310 GS
- Neutral (8.7 deg)
- QJ Motor SRT 900 SX
- Neutral (10.5 deg)