adventure / default rider 183 cm
BMW G 310 GS vs QJ Motor SRT 900 SX ergonomics
BMW G 310 GS and QJ Motor SRT 900 SX land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
BMW G 310 GS
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
QJ Motor SRT 900 SX
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW G 310 GS has a 835 mm seat; the QJ Motor SRT 900 SX sits at 835 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 84 cm for the BMW G 310 GS and 84 cm for the QJ Motor SRT 900 SX.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW G 310 GS | QJ Motor SRT 900 SX |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 835 mm | 835 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,420 mm | 1,540 mm |
| Wet weight | 175 kg | 264 kg |
| Displacement | 313 cc | 904 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW G 310 GS
- Sport (65.4 deg)
- QJ Motor SRT 900 SX
- Sport (65.6 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW G 310 GS
- Neutral (102.5 deg)
- QJ Motor SRT 900 SX
- Neutral (100.0 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW G 310 GS
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- QJ Motor SRT 900 SX
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW G 310 GS
- Neutral (8.7 deg)
- QJ Motor SRT 900 SX
- Neutral (10.5 deg)