sport / default rider 183 cm
BMW G 310 RR vs QJ Motor SRK 800 RR ergonomics
BMW G 310 RR and QJ Motor SRK 800 RR land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
BMW G 310 RR
90Comfortable
All contacts reached
QJ Motor SRK 800 RR
90Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW G 310 RR has a 811 mm seat; the QJ Motor SRK 800 RR sits at 815 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 81 cm for the BMW G 310 RR and 82 cm for the QJ Motor SRK 800 RR.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW G 310 RR | QJ Motor SRK 800 RR |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 811 mm | 815 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,341 mm | 1,450 mm |
| Wet weight | 174 kg | - |
| Displacement | 312 cc | 778 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW G 310 RR
- Sport (60.7 deg)
- QJ Motor SRK 800 RR
- Sport (60.7 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW G 310 RR
- Neutral (99.7 deg)
- QJ Motor SRK 800 RR
- Neutral (99.4 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW G 310 RR
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- QJ Motor SRK 800 RR
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW G 310 RR
- Forward (25.1 deg)
- QJ Motor SRK 800 RR
- Forward (25.7 deg)