sport / default rider 183 cm
BMW G 310 RR vs QJ Motor SRK 800 RR ergonomics
BMW G 310 RR and QJ Motor SRK 800 RR have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
BMW G 310 RR
All contacts reached
QJ Motor SRK 800 RR
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW G 310 RR lists a 811 mm seat; the QJ Motor SRK 800 RR lists 815 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW G 310 RR | QJ Motor SRK 800 RR |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 811 mm | 815 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,341 mm | 1,450 mm |
| Wet weight | 174 kg | - |
| Displacement | 312 cc | 778 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW G 310 RR
- Sport (60.7 deg)
- QJ Motor SRK 800 RR
- Sport (60.7 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW G 310 RR
- Neutral (99.7 deg)
- QJ Motor SRK 800 RR
- Neutral (99.4 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW G 310 RR
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- QJ Motor SRK 800 RR
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW G 310 RR
- Forward (25.1 deg)
- QJ Motor SRK 800 RR
- Forward (25.7 deg)