sport / default rider 183 cm
BMW G 310 RR vs Triumph Daytona 660 ergonomics
BMW G 310 RR and Triumph Daytona 660 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
BMW G 310 RR
90Comfortable
All contacts reached
Triumph Daytona 660
90Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW G 310 RR has a 811 mm seat; the Triumph Daytona 660 sits at 810 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 81 cm for the BMW G 310 RR and 81 cm for the Triumph Daytona 660.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW G 310 RR | Triumph Daytona 660 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 811 mm | 810 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,341 mm | 1,426 mm |
| Wet weight | 174 kg | 201 kg |
| Displacement | 312 cc | 660 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW G 310 RR
- Sport (60.7 deg)
- Triumph Daytona 660
- Sport (60.7 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW G 310 RR
- Neutral (99.7 deg)
- Triumph Daytona 660
- Neutral (99.0 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW G 310 RR
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Daytona 660
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW G 310 RR
- Forward (25.1 deg)
- Triumph Daytona 660
- Forward (25.9 deg)