dual-sport / default rider 183 cm
BMW G 650 Xchallenge vs Husqvarna Motorcycles 701 Enduro ergonomics
BMW G 650 Xchallenge and Husqvarna Motorcycles 701 Enduro land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
BMW G 650 Xchallenge
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Husqvarna Motorcycles 701 Enduro
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW G 650 Xchallenge has a 909 mm seat; the Husqvarna Motorcycles 701 Enduro sits at 910 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 91 cm for the BMW G 650 Xchallenge and 91 cm for the Husqvarna Motorcycles 701 Enduro.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW G 650 Xchallenge | Husqvarna Motorcycles 701 Enduro |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 909 mm | 910 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,501 mm | 1,505 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 652 cc | 693 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW G 650 Xchallenge
- Sport (67.6 deg)
- Husqvarna Motorcycles 701 Enduro
- Sport (67.6 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW G 650 Xchallenge
- Neutral (106.7 deg)
- Husqvarna Motorcycles 701 Enduro
- Neutral (106.7 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW G 650 Xchallenge
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Husqvarna Motorcycles 701 Enduro
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW G 650 Xchallenge
- Neutral (7.2 deg)
- Husqvarna Motorcycles 701 Enduro
- Neutral (7.3 deg)