touring / default rider 183 cm
BMW K 100 LT vs BMW R80RT Mono ergonomics
BMW K 100 LT scores 95 vs 90 for the default rider, making it the stronger ergonomic fit than BMW R80RT Mono in this comparison.
Fit verdict
BMW K 100 LT
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
BMW R80RT Mono
90Comfortable
All contacts reached
BMW K 100 LT has the stronger default-rider fit in this generated comparison.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW K 100 LT has a 810 mm seat; the BMW R80RT Mono sits at 810 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 81 cm for the BMW K 100 LT and 81 cm for the BMW R80RT Mono.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW K 100 LT | BMW R80RT Mono |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 810 mm | 810 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,516 mm | 1,466 mm |
| Wet weight | 283 kg | 235 kg |
| Displacement | 987 cc | 798 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW K 100 LT
- Neutral (75.6 deg)
- BMW R80RT Mono
- Sport (74.6 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW K 100 LT
- Sport (82.2 deg)
- BMW R80RT Mono
- Sport (83.4 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW K 100 LT
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- BMW R80RT Mono
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW K 100 LT
- Neutral (9.0 deg)
- BMW R80RT Mono
- Neutral (8.3 deg)