touring / default rider 183 cm
BMW K1300GT vs BMW R100RT ergonomics
BMW K1300GT scores 95 vs 90 for the default rider, making it the stronger ergonomic fit than BMW R100RT in this comparison.
Fit verdict
BMW K1300GT
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
BMW R100RT
90Comfortable
All contacts reached
BMW K1300GT has the stronger default-rider fit in this generated comparison.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW K1300GT has a 820 mm seat; the BMW R100RT sits at 820 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 82 cm for the BMW K1300GT and 82 cm for the BMW R100RT.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW K1300GT | BMW R100RT |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 820 mm | 820 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,572 mm | 1,465 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 234 kg |
| Displacement | 1,293 cc | 980 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW K1300GT
- Neutral (76.9 deg)
- BMW R100RT
- Sport (74.7 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW K1300GT
- Sport (81.1 deg)
- BMW R100RT
- Sport (83.3 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW K1300GT
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- BMW R100RT
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW K1300GT
- Neutral (9.8 deg)
- BMW R100RT
- Neutral (8.4 deg)