naked / default rider 183 cm
BMW M 1000 R vs Triumph Street Triple R ergonomics
BMW M 1000 R scores 95 vs 91 for the default rider, making it the stronger ergonomic fit than Triumph Street Triple R in this comparison.
Fit verdict
BMW M 1000 R
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Triumph Street Triple R
91Comfortable
All contacts reached
BMW M 1000 R has the stronger default-rider fit in this generated comparison.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW M 1000 R | Triumph Street Triple R |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 828 mm | 826 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,455 mm | 1,402 mm |
| Wet weight | 199 kg | 188 kg |
| Displacement | 999 cc | 765 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW M 1000 R
- Sport (61.7 deg)
- Triumph Street Triple R
- Sport (74.7 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW M 1000 R
- Neutral (91.4 deg)
- Triumph Street Triple R
- Open (129.2 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW M 1000 R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Street Triple R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW M 1000 R
- Neutral (12.9 deg)
- Triumph Street Triple R
- Neutral (17.9 deg)