standard / default rider 183 cm
BMW R 12 nineT vs Brixton Cromwell 1200 ergonomics
BMW R 12 nineT and Brixton Cromwell 1200 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
BMW R 12 nineT
All contacts reached
Brixton Cromwell 1200
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW R 12 nineT lists a 795 mm seat; the Brixton Cromwell 1200 lists 795 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW R 12 nineT | Brixton Cromwell 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 795 mm | 795 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,510 mm | 1,530 mm |
| Wet weight | 220 kg | 235 kg |
| Displacement | 1,170 cc | 1,222 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW R 12 nineT
- Sport (58.2 deg)
- Brixton Cromwell 1200
- Sport (58.3 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW R 12 nineT
- Neutral (92.6 deg)
- Brixton Cromwell 1200
- Neutral (92.2 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW R 12 nineT
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Brixton Cromwell 1200
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW R 12 nineT
- Neutral (12.9 deg)
- Brixton Cromwell 1200
- Neutral (13.2 deg)