adventure / default rider 183 cm
BMW R 1200 GS vs KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo ergonomics
BMW R 1200 GS and KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
BMW R 1200 GS
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW R 1200 GS | KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 850 mm | 849 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,507 mm | 1,577 mm |
| Wet weight | 238 kg | 249 kg |
| Displacement | 1,170 cc | 1,350 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW R 1200 GS
- Sport (65.5 deg)
- KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo
- Sport (65.7 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW R 1200 GS
- Neutral (100.7 deg)
- KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo
- Neutral (99.3 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW R 1200 GS
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW R 1200 GS
- Neutral (10.0 deg)
- KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo
- Neutral (11.0 deg)