adventure / default rider 183 cm
BMW R 1300 GS vs KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo ergonomics
BMW R 1300 GS and KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
BMW R 1300 GS
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW R 1300 GS has a 848 mm seat; the KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo sits at 849 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 85 cm for the BMW R 1300 GS and 85 cm for the KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW R 1300 GS | KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 848 mm | 849 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,519 mm | 1,577 mm |
| Wet weight | 237 kg | 249 kg |
| Displacement | 1,300 cc | 1,350 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW R 1300 GS
- Sport (65.6 deg)
- KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo
- Sport (65.7 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW R 1300 GS
- Neutral (100.4 deg)
- KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo
- Neutral (99.3 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW R 1300 GS
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW R 1300 GS
- Neutral (10.1 deg)
- KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo
- Neutral (11.0 deg)