cruiser / default rider 183 cm
BMW R 18 vs Keeway V302 C ergonomics
Keeway V302 C scores 95 vs 92 for the default rider, making it the stronger ergonomic fit than BMW R 18 in this comparison.
Fit verdict
BMW R 18
92Comfortable
All contacts reached
Keeway V302 C
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Keeway V302 C has the stronger default-rider fit in this generated comparison.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW R 18 has a 690 mm seat; the Keeway V302 C sits at 690 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 69 cm for the BMW R 18 and 69 cm for the Keeway V302 C.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW R 18 | Keeway V302 C |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 690 mm | 690 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,731 mm | 1,420 mm |
| Wet weight | 345 kg | - |
| Displacement | 1,802 cc | 298 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW R 18
- Open (128.8 deg)
- Keeway V302 C
- Neutral (102.6 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW R 18
- Sport (81.7 deg)
- Keeway V302 C
- Sport (78.2 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW R 18
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Keeway V302 C
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW R 18
- Neutral (11.4 deg)
- Keeway V302 C
- Neutral (6.6 deg)