cruiser / default rider 183 cm
BMW R 18 vs Kawasaki Vulcan 1700 Classic ergonomics
BMW R 18 and Kawasaki Vulcan 1700 Classic land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
BMW R 18
92Comfortable
All contacts reached
Kawasaki Vulcan 1700 Classic
92Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW R 18 has a 719 mm seat; the Kawasaki Vulcan 1700 Classic sits at 719 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 72 cm for the BMW R 18 and 72 cm for the Kawasaki Vulcan 1700 Classic.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW R 18 | Kawasaki Vulcan 1700 Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 719 mm | 719 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,730 mm | 1,666 mm |
| Wet weight | 345 kg | 349 kg |
| Displacement | 1,802 cc | 1,700 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW R 18
- Open (128.6 deg)
- Kawasaki Vulcan 1700 Classic
- Open (122.1 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW R 18
- Sport (81.6 deg)
- Kawasaki Vulcan 1700 Classic
- Sport (80.2 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW R 18
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Kawasaki Vulcan 1700 Classic
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW R 18
- Neutral (11.4 deg)
- Kawasaki Vulcan 1700 Classic
- Neutral (10.5 deg)