adventure / default rider 183 cm
BMW R 80 G/S vs KTM 1190 Adventure ergonomics
BMW R 80 G/S and KTM 1190 Adventure land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
BMW R 80 G/S
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
KTM 1190 Adventure
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW R 80 G/S | KTM 1190 Adventure |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 860 mm | 860 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,465 mm | 1,560 mm |
| Wet weight | 186 kg | - |
| Displacement | 797 cc | 1,195 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW R 80 G/S
- Sport (65.4 deg)
- KTM 1190 Adventure
- Sport (65.7 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW R 80 G/S
- Neutral (101.7 deg)
- KTM 1190 Adventure
- Neutral (99.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW R 80 G/S
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- KTM 1190 Adventure
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW R 80 G/S
- Neutral (9.3 deg)
- KTM 1190 Adventure
- Neutral (10.7 deg)