adventure / default rider 183 cm
BMW R 80 G/S vs Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro ergonomics
Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro scores 100 vs 95 for the default rider, making it the stronger ergonomic fit than BMW R 80 G/S in this comparison.
Fit verdict
BMW R 80 G/S
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro
100Comfortable
All contacts reached
Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro has the stronger default-rider fit in this generated comparison.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW R 80 G/S | Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 860 mm | 860 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,465 mm | 1,556 mm |
| Wet weight | 186 kg | 228 kg |
| Displacement | 797 cc | 888 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW R 80 G/S
- Sport (65.4 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro
- Neutral (93.3 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW R 80 G/S
- Neutral (101.7 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro
- Neutral (108.0 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW R 80 G/S
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW R 80 G/S
- Neutral (9.3 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro
- Neutral (17.6 deg)