scrambler / default rider 183 cm
BMW R nineT Scrambler vs Brixton Felsberg 125 XC ergonomics
BMW R nineT Scrambler and Brixton Felsberg 125 XC land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
BMW R nineT Scrambler
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Brixton Felsberg 125 XC
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW R nineT Scrambler has a 820 mm seat; the Brixton Felsberg 125 XC sits at 820 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 82 cm for the BMW R nineT Scrambler and 82 cm for the Brixton Felsberg 125 XC.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW R nineT Scrambler | Brixton Felsberg 125 XC |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 820 mm | 820 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,527 mm | 1,320 mm |
| Wet weight | 223 kg | - |
| Displacement | 1,170 cc | 125 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW R nineT Scrambler
- Sport (58.2 deg)
- Brixton Felsberg 125 XC
- Sport (57.8 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW R nineT Scrambler
- Neutral (92.4 deg)
- Brixton Felsberg 125 XC
- Neutral (96.9 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW R nineT Scrambler
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Brixton Felsberg 125 XC
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW R nineT Scrambler
- Neutral (13.2 deg)
- Brixton Felsberg 125 XC
- Neutral (10.1 deg)