scrambler / default rider 183 cm
BMW R nineT Urban G/S vs FB Mondial Flat Track 125 ergonomics
BMW R nineT Urban G/S and FB Mondial Flat Track 125 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
BMW R nineT Urban G/S
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
FB Mondial Flat Track 125
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW R nineT Urban G/S has a 850 mm seat; the FB Mondial Flat Track 125 sits at 846 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 85 cm for the BMW R nineT Urban G/S and 85 cm for the FB Mondial Flat Track 125.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW R nineT Urban G/S | FB Mondial Flat Track 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 850 mm | 846 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,527 mm | 1,360 mm |
| Wet weight | 221 kg | - |
| Displacement | 1,170 cc | 124 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW R nineT Urban G/S
- Sport (58.2 deg)
- FB Mondial Flat Track 125
- Sport (57.9 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW R nineT Urban G/S
- Neutral (92.4 deg)
- FB Mondial Flat Track 125
- Neutral (95.9 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW R nineT Urban G/S
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- FB Mondial Flat Track 125
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW R nineT Urban G/S
- Neutral (13.2 deg)
- FB Mondial Flat Track 125
- Neutral (10.7 deg)