touring / default rider 183 cm
BMW R100 RT vs CFMoto 1250TR-G ergonomics
BMW R100 RT and CFMoto 1250TR-G land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
BMW R100 RT
90Comfortable
All contacts reached
CFMoto 1250TR-G
90Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW R100 RT has a 820 mm seat; the CFMoto 1250TR-G sits at 820 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 82 cm for the BMW R100 RT and 82 cm for the CFMoto 1250TR-G.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW R100 RT | CFMoto 1250TR-G |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 820 mm | 820 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,466 mm | 1,482 mm |
| Wet weight | 234 kg | - |
| Displacement | 980 cc | 1,279 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW R100 RT
- Sport (74.6 deg)
- CFMoto 1250TR-G
- Sport (74.9 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW R100 RT
- Sport (83.4 deg)
- CFMoto 1250TR-G
- Sport (83.0 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW R100 RT
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- CFMoto 1250TR-G
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW R100 RT
- Neutral (8.3 deg)
- CFMoto 1250TR-G
- Neutral (8.5 deg)