touring / default rider 183 cm
BMW R100 RT vs CFMoto 1250TR-G ergonomics
BMW R100 RT and CFMoto 1250TR-G have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
BMW R100 RT
All contacts reached
CFMoto 1250TR-G
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW R100 RT lists a 820 mm seat; the CFMoto 1250TR-G lists 820 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW R100 RT | CFMoto 1250TR-G |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 820 mm | 820 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,466 mm | 1,482 mm |
| Wet weight | 234 kg | - |
| Displacement | 980 cc | 1,279 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW R100 RT
- Sport (74.6 deg)
- CFMoto 1250TR-G
- Sport (74.9 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW R100 RT
- Sport (83.4 deg)
- CFMoto 1250TR-G
- Sport (83.0 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW R100 RT
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- CFMoto 1250TR-G
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW R100 RT
- Neutral (8.3 deg)
- CFMoto 1250TR-G
- Neutral (8.5 deg)