cafe-racer / default rider 183 cm
BMW R100S vs Husqvarna Motorcycles Vitpilen 250 ergonomics
BMW R100S and Husqvarna Motorcycles Vitpilen 250 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
BMW R100S
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Husqvarna Motorcycles Vitpilen 250
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW R100S has a 820 mm seat; the Husqvarna Motorcycles Vitpilen 250 sits at 820 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 82 cm for the BMW R100S and 82 cm for the Husqvarna Motorcycles Vitpilen 250.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW R100S | Husqvarna Motorcycles Vitpilen 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 820 mm | 820 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,466 mm | 1,368 mm |
| Wet weight | 220 kg | 164 kg |
| Displacement | 980 cc | 249 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW R100S
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Husqvarna Motorcycles Vitpilen 250
- Sport (57.9 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW R100S
- Neutral (93.6 deg)
- Husqvarna Motorcycles Vitpilen 250
- Neutral (95.8 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW R100S
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Husqvarna Motorcycles Vitpilen 250
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW R100S
- Neutral (12.3 deg)
- Husqvarna Motorcycles Vitpilen 250
- Neutral (10.9 deg)