standard / default rider 183 cm
BMW R90/6 vs Yamaha XSR900 ergonomics
Yamaha XSR900 scores 100 vs 95 for the default rider, making it the stronger ergonomic fit than BMW R90/6 in this comparison.
Fit verdict
BMW R90/6
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Yamaha XSR900
100Comfortable
All contacts reached
Yamaha XSR900 has the stronger default-rider fit in this generated comparison.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The BMW R90/6 has a 810 mm seat; the Yamaha XSR900 sits at 810 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 81 cm for the BMW R90/6 and 81 cm for the Yamaha XSR900.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | BMW R90/6 | Yamaha XSR900 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 810 mm | 810 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,465 mm | 1,495 mm |
| Wet weight | 209 kg | 193 kg |
| Displacement | 898 cc | 890 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- BMW R90/6
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Yamaha XSR900
- Neutral (75.7 deg)
Hip angle
- BMW R90/6
- Neutral (95.4 deg)
- Yamaha XSR900
- Neutral (115.7 deg)
Elbow angle
- BMW R90/6
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Yamaha XSR900
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- BMW R90/6
- Neutral (10.6 deg)
- Yamaha XSR900
- Neutral (17.9 deg)