electric / default rider 183 cm
Brammo Enertia vs NIU MQi GT EVO ergonomics
Brammo Enertia and NIU MQi GT EVO have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Brammo Enertia
All contacts reached
NIU MQi GT EVO
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Brammo Enertia lists a 813 mm seat; the NIU MQi GT EVO lists 816 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Brammo Enertia | NIU MQi GT EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 813 mm | 816 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,422 mm | 1,380 mm |
| Wet weight | 177 kg | 128 kg |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Brammo Enertia
- Sport (58.0 deg)
- NIU MQi GT EVO
- Sport (57.9 deg)
Hip angle
- Brammo Enertia
- Neutral (94.6 deg)
- NIU MQi GT EVO
- Neutral (95.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- Brammo Enertia
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- NIU MQi GT EVO
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Brammo Enertia
- Neutral (11.7 deg)
- NIU MQi GT EVO
- Neutral (11.0 deg)